A Coordinated Electric System Interconnection Review—the utility’s deep-dive on technical and cost impacts of your project.

Challenge: Frequent false tripping using conventional electromechanical relays
Solution: SEL-487E integration with multi-terminal differential protection and dynamic inrush restraint
Result: 90% reduction in false trips, saving over $250,000 in downtime

PRC-029-1 Explained: Applicability, Key Dates, and What Generator Owners Must Do Now

PRC-029-1 explained for generator owners with wind and solar power illustration
Calendar icon. D

january 30, 2026 | Blog

Introduction

The adoption of NERC Reliability Standard PRC-029-1 marks a fundamental shift in how generator ride-through performance—particularly for Inverter-Based Resources (IBRs)—is regulated in North America. Unlike legacy standards that focused primarily on protection settings, PRC-029-1 introduces a performance-based framework that relies on actual disturbance behavior, supported by monitoring data and post-event validation.

This blog provides a comprehensive, date-driven explanation of PRC-029-1, including its regulatory origins, phased implementation schedule, applicability thresholds, and how it interacts with PRC-024-4, PRC-028-1, IEEE 2800-2022, and ERCOT NOGRR 245.


Regulatory Background: Why PRC-029-1 Exists

NERC Project 2020-02 was initiated in response to widespread and recurring IBR ride-through failures observed across multiple Interconnections over the past decade. Numerous NERC event analyses, disturbance reports, and industry alerts demonstrated that generators—particularly IBRs—were disconnecting during grid disturbances even when protection settings complied with PRC-024-3.

Recognizing this gap, the NERC Standards Committee approved a Standard Authorization Request (SAR) to either modify PRC-024-3 or replace it with a performance-based ride-through standard. The revised SAR was accepted on April 19, 2023, following initial acceptance on April 20, 2022 .

The regulatory urgency increased with FERC Order No. 901, issued in October 2023, which directed NERC to develop new or modified Reliability Standards addressing:

  • Ride-through performance,
  • Disturbance monitoring,
  • Data sharing,
  • Post-event performance validation, and
  • Corrective action plans for IBR performance failures.

To comply with Order 901, NERC was required to file IBR ride-through standards with FERC by November 4, 2024, which directly drove the development and approval of PRC-029-1 .


Key Milestone Dates

Milestone Date
SAR initially accepted April 20, 2022
Revised SAR accepted April 19, 2023
NERC Board adoption October 8, 2024
Filed with FERC November 4, 2024
PRC-024-3 retirement Immediately prior to PRC-024-4 / PRC-029-1 effective date

PRC-024-4 vs. PRC-029-1: Clear Separation of Applicability

One of the most important outcomes of Project 2020-02 is the clear separation of responsibilities between synchronous resources and IBRs:


  • PRC-024-4 now applies to:
  • Synchronous generators,
  • Type 1 and Type 2 wind resources,
  • Synchronous condensers.
  • PRC-029-1 applies exclusively to:

Inverter-Based Generating Resources (IBRs).

This change formally removes IBRs from PRC-024 and places them under a new, performance-based compliance regime


Effective Date of PRC-029-1

The effective date of PRC-029-1 depends on jurisdictional approval:

Where governmental approval is required (e.g., FERC):
PRC-029-1 becomes effective on the first day of the first calendar quarter that is twelve months after the effective date of the approving authority’s order.


Where approval is not required:

The standard becomes effective twelve months after adoption by the NERC Board of Trustees.

This effectively places PRC-029-1’s initial enforceability in 2026 for most U.S. jurisdictions, depending on the final approval timeline .



Phased-In Compliance: Design vs. Operation

A defining feature of PRC-029-1 is its staggered compliance approach, recognizing that:

Design requirements can be verified relatively quickly, while

Operational performance requires disturbance monitoring data over time.

Requirements R1, R2, and R3

These requirements contain both capability-based (design) and performance-based (operation) elements.

Bulk Electric System (BES) IBRs

  • Design compliance:
    Required by the effective date of the standard.
  • Operational compliance:
    Required after disturbance monitoring equipment is installed, in alignment with the PRC-028-1 implementation plan.

Applicable Non-BES IBRs

Defined as non-BES IBRs ≥20 MVA aggregated capacity connected at ≥60 kV.

  • Design compliance:
    Required by the later of January 1, 2027 or the standard’s effective date.
  • Operational compliance:
    Deferred until disturbance monitoring capabilities are established.



Requirement R4: Equipment Limitations and Exemptions

Requirement R4 addresses situations where certain legacy IBRs cannot meet ride-through

requirements due to hardware limitations.

Key points:

  • Only IBRs in operation as of the effective date of PRC-029-1 may be considered.
  • Only limitations that cannot be resolved through software or settings changes qualify.
  • Hardware-based exemptions must be documented, justified, and reported.

This provision aligns directly with FERC Order 901, which acknowledges that some older IBR technologies may require physical replacement to fully comply .



The Role of Disturbance Monitoring (PRC-028-1)

PRC-029-1 explicitly depends on disturbance monitoring data to demonstrate operational compliance. As such:

  • Full operational compliance with R1–R3 is not required until disturbance monitoring equipment is installed.
  • PRC-028-1 defines the monitoring, recording, and reporting requirements that support PRC-029-1 evidence.

This linkage formally moves the industry from settings-based compliance to measured performance-based compliance.


Why PRC-029-1 Is a Major Paradigm Shift

PRC-029-1 represents:

  • A shift from protection settings to actual ride-through behavior,
  • Increased reliance on event data and model validation,
  • Greater scrutiny of inverter controls, plant controllers, and hybrid interactions,
  • A direct bridge to IEEE 2800-2022 performance expectations, and
  • Alignment with ISO-specific requirements such as ERCOT NOGRR 245 and MQT.

For Generator Owners, this means compliance is no longer a one-time documentation exercise—it is an ongoing performance obligation.


What Generator Owners Should Be Doing Now

  1. Identify which assets are IBRs under PRC-029-1.
  2. Classify assets as BES vs non-BES applicable IBRs.
  3. Verify design-level ride-through capability.
  4. Assess disturbance monitoring readiness.
  5. Review inverter and plant controller settings against IEEE 2800-2022.
  6. Develop a strategy for R4 documentation, if applicable.
  7. Coordinate PRC-029-1 efforts with ERCOT MQT and NOGRR 245 where relevant.

Conclusion

PRC-029-1 is not simply a replacement for PRC-024—it is a fundamental restructuring of generator ride-through compliance. With phased timelines, performance-based evidence, and strong linkage to disturbance monitoring, Generator Owners who act early will be far better positioned to manage compliance risk and avoid last-minute corrective actions.

At Keentel Engineering, we support Generator Owners through PRC-029-1 applicability assessments, ride-through studies, ERCOT MQT alignment, PSCAD EMT analysis, and audit-ready documentation.


Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)

  • 1. What is PRC-029-1?

    PRC-029-1 is a performance-based NERC Reliability Standard that establishes voltage and frequency ride-through requirements specifically for Inverter-Based Resources (IBRs). Unlike PRC-024, it relies on measured performance during real grid disturbances, supported by disturbance monitoring data.


  • 2. Why was PRC-029 created?

    PRC-029 was developed in response to widespread IBR ride-through failures documented in NERC event reports and mandated by FERC Order 901, which required performance-based IBR ride-through standards.


  • 3. How is PRC-029 different from PRC-024?

    PRC-024 focuses on protection settings, while PRC-029 evaluates actual ride-through behavior using event data and validated models.


  • 4. Does PRC-029 apply to synchronous generators?

    No. PRC-029 applies only to IBRs. Synchronous generators are now covered under PRC-024-4.


  • 5. Which IBRs are subject to PRC-029?

    BES IBRs

    Certain non-BES IBRs ≥20 MVA aggregated capacity connected at ≥60 kV


  • 6. When does PRC-029 become enforceable?

    Generally in 2026, depending on jurisdictional approval timelines (12 months after FERC approval, effective at the next calendar quarter).


  • 7. What are the core requirements of PRC-029?

    R1: Voltage ride-through capability

    R2: Reactive current and control behavior

    R3: Frequency ride-through capability

    R4: Hardware limitation documentation


  • 8. What is “performance-based” compliance?

    Compliance is demonstrated using actual disturbance data, not just relay or inverter settings.


  • 9. Is modeling alone sufficient for compliance?

    No. Modeling supports compliance, but measured event performance is the primary evidence once disturbance monitoring is available.


  • 10. How does PRC-028 relate to PRC-029?

    PRC-028 provides the disturbance monitoring equipment and data required to demonstrate PRC-029 operational compliance.


  • 11. Is disturbance monitoring mandatory for PRC-029?

    Yes — operational compliance cannot be demonstrated without disturbance monitoring equipment installed per PRC-028.


  • 12. What happens if an IBR trips during a disturbance?

    The event must be analyzed, documented, and if non-compliant, addressed with corrective actions.


  • 13. What qualifies as a hardware limitation under R4?

    Only physical equipment limitations that cannot be resolved via settings or firmware changes.


  • 14. Are legacy IBRs eligible for R4?

    Only IBRs in service as of the PRC-029 effective date.


  • 15. Does PRC-029 require PSCAD modeling?

    Not universally. PSCAD is used only when EMT-level validation is required (e.g., phase-angle jump, performance failure analysis).


  • 16. How does IEEE 2800-2022 relate to PRC-029?

    IEEE 2800 defines performance expectations; PRC-029 enforces those expectations using real disturbance data.


  • 17. How does PRC-029 affect hybrid plants?

    Hybrid plants are evaluated as a single IBR resource, with scrutiny on control interactions between components.


  • 18. What is the role of ERCOT MQT?

    MQT validates models used to support PRC-029 compliance but does not replace event-based evidence.


  • 19. Does PRC-029 replace PRC-024 entirely?

    For IBRs, yes. For synchronous machines, PRC-024 remains applicable.


  • 20. How often must compliance be demonstrated?

    Continuously, as events occur — not just once at commissioning.


  • 21. Can PRC-029 trigger enforcement actions?

    Yes, if repeated or systemic ride-through failures occur without corrective action.


  • 22. How should Generator Owners prepare now?

    Inventory IBRs, verify ride-through capability, install DME, review controls, and align with IEEE 2800.


  • 23. What is the biggest compliance risk?

    Assuming protection settings alone equal compliance.


  • 24. Does PRC-029 apply outside ERCOT?

    Yes — PRC-029 is a NERC-wide standard, not ERCOT-specific.


  • 25. How can Keentel Engineering help?

    Through applicability assessments, ride-through studies, MQT alignment, PSCAD EMT analysis, and audit-ready compliance documentation.




Man in a blazer and open shirt, looking at the camera, against a blurred background.

About the Author:

Sonny Patel P.E. EC

IEEE Senior Member

In 1995, Sandip (Sonny) R. Patel earned his Electrical Engineering degree from the University of Illinois, specializing in Electrical Engineering . But degrees don’t build legacies—action does. For three decades, he’s been shaping the future of engineering, not just as a licensed Professional Engineer across multiple states (Florida, California, New York, West Virginia, and Minnesota), but as a doer. A builder. A leader. Not just an engineer. A Licensed Electrical Contractor in Florida with an Unlimited EC license. Not just an executive. The founder and CEO of KEENTEL LLC—where expertise meets execution. Three decades. Multiple states. Endless impact.

Four workers in safety vests and helmets stand with arms crossed near wind turbines.

Let's Discuss Your Project

Let's book a call to discuss your electrical engineering project that we can help you with.

Man in a blazer and open shirt, looking at the camera, against a blurred background.

About the Author:

Sonny Patel P.E. EC

IEEE Senior Member

In 1995, Sandip (Sonny) R. Patel earned his Electrical Engineering degree from the University of Illinois, specializing in Electrical Engineering . But degrees don’t build legacies—action does. For three decades, he’s been shaping the future of engineering, not just as a licensed Professional Engineer across multiple states (Florida, California, New York, West Virginia, and Minnesota), but as a doer. A builder. A leader. Not just an engineer. A Licensed Electrical Contractor in Florida with an Unlimited EC license. Not just an executive. The founder and CEO of KEENTEL LLC—where expertise meets execution. Three decades. Multiple states. Endless impact.

Leave a Comment

Related Posts

IBR Registration Initiative for Category 2 Generator Owners and Operators
By SANDIP R PATEL January 31, 2026
Learn what the IBR Registration Initiative means for Category 2 Generator Owners and Operators, key deadlines through May 2026, required documentation, and how Keentel Engineering supports NERC compliance readiness.
Understanding Category 2 IBR Registration and Compliance white paper cover by Keentel Engineering fe
By SANDIP R PATEL January 31, 2026
Complete guide to Category 2 IBR registration and compliance, including NERC requirements, FERC Order 901, CMEP enforcement, applicable standards, and preparation steps.
Map of 2025-2026 Winter Reliability Risks for the power grid with Keentel Engineering logo.
By SANDIP R PATEL January 29, 2026
The 2025–2026 Winter Reliability Assessment highlights rising winter demand, resource mix shifts, and NERC compliance changes, impacting grid reliability and engineering.
Lifecycle management of T&D switchgear using condition monitoring data, showing engineers analyzing
By SANDIP R PATEL January 24, 2026
Learn how utilities use condition monitoring data to manage T&D switchgear lifecycles, reduce failure risk, extend asset life, and enable condition-based maintenance.
Frequency response characteristics of voltage measurement systems illustrated with substation and wa
By SANDIP R PATEL January 21, 2026
Explore frequency response characteristics of voltage measurement systems used in power substations and grid analysis by Keentel Engineering.
Keentel Engineering white paper cover on reevaluating IEEE and IEC substation standards for increase
By SANDIP R PATEL January 21, 2026
Professional white paper cover by Keentel Engineering on reevaluating IEEE and IEC substation standards, featuring an electrical substation under fault conditions.
Learn how PJM D-Curve reactive capability testing is performed for wind farms and inverter-based res
By SANDIP R PATEL January 15, 2026
Learn how PJM D-Curve reactive capability testing is performed for wind farms and inverter-based resources, including testing requirements, measurement basis, and eDART submission support.
Energy sector integration showing power grids, wind turbines, solar energy, and multi-energy system
By SANDIP R PATEL January 1, 2026
Explore how energy sector integration reshapes modern power grids, improving decarbonization, resilience, and system planning based on CIGRE TB 973 insights.
Diagram illustrating real-code EMT modeling for HVDC, FACTS, and inverter-based resources in power s
By SANDIP R PATEL January 1, 2026
Learn how IEEE/CIGRE real-code EMT modeling improves HVDC, FACTS, and inverter-based resource studies with higher fidelity, compliance accuracy, and tool-independent simulation.